With AI-generated content popping up everywhere, it’s no surprise that tools to detect it are getting smarter too.
So, I decided to take a closer look at WriteHuman, an AI humanizer that claims it can make AI-generated text bypass popular AI detection tools without a hitch.
But does WriteHuman really live up to its big promises, or are there better options out there? Here’s what I have discovered in my honest WriteHuman review.
Humbot Can Effectively Outsmart All AI Detectors
Easily bypass AI detection with Humbot. Start publishing AI content that appears human-written with confidence and let your creativity flow without any risks!
Bypass Popular AI Detectors Effortlessly Using Humbot
What Exactly is WriteHuman?
WriteHuman uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) to rewrite AI-generated content so it can bypass those leading AI detectors.
It was started by Ivan Jackson in 2024, and I think it’s pretty cool that it offers both free and paid tiers, making it accessible for users like me who want straightforward solutions to bypass AI detection.
Honestly, the simplicity of it feels refreshing, but I’m curious to see if it really delivers as promised.
Does WriteHuman Effectively Bypass AI Detection?
To see if WriteHuman can really eliminate AI detectors, I’m going to walk you through how I used it in a typical content creation process.
First, I headed over to ChatGPT and asked it to generate a short article about parenting:
The text looked decent enough at first glance, but I know AI detection tools are clever and could probably spot it as AI-generated.
So, I copied the whole article and pasted it into WriteHuman to let it work its magic and humanize the text. Here’s what came out:
One thing to keep in mind—I found out that free users like me are capped at just three outputs per month.
WriteHuman’s built-in AI detector gave this rewritten text a 99.3% human score, which sounds amazing, like it’s basically indistinguishable from something a human would write.
But I’m a bit skeptical—does it really hold up? To find out just how “human-like” this text is, I decided to put the humanized text through several AI detectors to see if it can truly bypass the detection.
WriteHuman vs Originality.ai
When I ran the rewritten text through Originality.ai, the results were a bit of a letdown. It was pretty clear the text didn’t come off as human-written at all.
Originality.ai gave it a measly 9% originality score and a whopping 91% AI score. In other words, it’s 91% sure the content is AI-generated, which makes me think other AI detectors would likely flag it too.
WriteHuman vs GPTZero
When I tested the rewritten text with GPTZero, the results were pretty much in line with Originality.ai, which was a bit disappointing.
Every single sentence of the humanized text got highlighted, with GPTZero labeling them as "likely AI-generated." Overall, it gave the text a 90% probability of being AI-generated—just 1% lower than the results from my first test.
One thing that caught my attention, though, is that GPTZero also flagged some parts as "mixed," meaning a blend of AI-generated and human-written content.
From what I understand, this happens when a sentence doesn’t scream “AI” but still doesn’t quite have that natural human touch. It’s an interesting nuance, but it doesn’t change the fact that the text failed to bypass this AI detector.
WriteHuman vs. Copyleaks
While not as comprehensive as the other two AI detectors, Copyleaks highlighted every sentence in red, clearly indicating that the text is AI-generated:
A Superior Alternative to WriteHuman: Humbot
WriteHuman claims a high human score, but when I ran the rewritten text through those AI detectors, it was clearly still marked as AI-generated. That was a real letdown to me.
Luckily, there are more effective options out there, and Humbot is one that you can really rely on. It’s an undetectable AI humanizer that works a bit like WriteHuman but with some serious upgrades.
For one, the content it humanizes can truly bypass AI detection. Plus, it can humanize text from big-name AI models like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, making it a much more reliable choice for creating content that feels genuinely human.
I think it’s a game-changer for anyone who needs undetectable results to evade those leading AI detection tools.
Humbot uses some seriously advanced AI text humanization technology to keep AI-generated content under the radar.
From what I’ve seen, it does a great job against top AI detectors like GPTZero and Originality.ai, and I will share more on that soon.
Plus, all the humanized content from Humbot comes with a plagiarism-free guarantee, so I don’t have to worry about any legal issues.
It just feels like a solid, trustworthy tool that’s got my back when I need undetectable, original content.
Humbot's Key Features
Here are some of the main features of Humbot:
- Efficiently handles text content generated from ChatGPT, Gemini, and more
- Employs advanced text humanization technology to transform AI-generated text
- Successfully bypasses the leading AI detectors
- Generates content that is free from plagiarism
- Maintains the original meaning of the text
- Offers customization options for evading AI detection
- Produces SEO-friendly results
Is Humbot More Effective Than WriteHuman in Evading AI Detection?
To see just how well Humbot can bypass AI detection, I decided to take the same ChatGPT-generated text I used for the WriteHuman tests and run it through Humbot’s humanization process. Here’s what I got after Humbot worked its magic:
The text looks pretty solid right now, but I’m not ready to call it undetectable. To be sure, I’m going to test it against the same AI detectors to confirm it can really generate undetectable content. I’m optimistic, but let’s see how it holds up!
Humbot vs. Originality.ai
Using their 2.0 model, Originality.ai gave the text an impressive 90% human score, which told me it’s super confident the article read like it was written by a human. That’s a huge win compared to WriteHuman!
And don’t let that 10% AI score throw you off—it doesn’t mean the article was 10% AI-generated. It just means Originality.ai was only 10% sure it’s AI, while being 90% convinced it’s original human work.
Humbot Versus GPTZero
GPTZero was completely convinced, giving the text a 100% human score with zero AI content detected. Not a single sentence got flagged as AI-generated, which makes it look like a human wrote the whole thing.
There was a tiny 4% mention of possible mixed content, but with an AI score of 0%, I think that’s practically negligible. This was seriously promising for an AI humanizer.
Humbot Versus Copyleaks
Copyleaks produced the same outcome as GPTZero, categorizing it as human text without any indications of AI-generated content.
WriteHuman versus Humbot: A Brief Comparison
Below is a concise summary of all the tests conducted on both WriteHuman and Humbot:
| AI Detection Tools | WriteHuman Results | Humbot Results |
| Originality.ai | 9% Human, 91% AI | 90% Human, 10% AI |
| GPTZero | 6% Human, 4% Mixed, 90% AI | 96% Human, 4% Mixed, 0% AI |
| Copyleaks | AI-Generated | Human-Written |
Looking at the results, I can confidently say Humbot comes out on top as the clear winner. WriteHuman’s website boasts a 99.3% human score, but it totally failed in all three tests I ran, which was a bit of a shock.
Humbot outshines WriteHuman by a huge margin. On top of that, Humbot packs a ton of extra features alongside its already rock-solid humanization technology, making it the obvious choice if you’re deciding between the two.
Conclusion
AI humanizers can really streamline your writing workflow when you’re using AI to help create content. But the key is making sure the humanized text can actually bypass AI detectors.
WriteHuman claims a super high human score, but honestly, it bombed in my real tests, so I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone just starting out.
From digging into WriteHuman for this review, it’s clear to me that if you want an undetectable AI writer that can reliably bypass those top AI detectors, you need something that’s not only effective but also user-friendly and packed with handy features.
That’s where tools like Humbot shine. I think it’s a much better choice for anyone looking to make AI humanizers a regular part of their long-term content creation process.