GPTinf Review: My Look Into Its Effectiveness

Like many of you, I am intrigued by AI humanizers that blur the line between AI and human writing.

Tools like GPTinf say it can make machine-generated content sound natural and bypass AI detection. So I decided to take GPTinf for a spin.

In this article, I am sharing my experience as I put GPTinf through its paces against some leading AI detectors to uncover how effective it really is.

Utilize Humbot to Avoid AI Detection Hassles

Effortlessly bypass AI detectors with the help of Humbot. Experience the power of professional, high-quality, and undetectable AI writing by getting started today!

GPTinf Introduction

GPTinf is a newcomer to the AI scene that launched in 2023. It’s got a simple AI text humanizer that claims it can outsmart a bunch of AI detection tools like Turnitin, GPTZero, and Copyleaks.

The platform runs on a monthly subscription, where the price depends on how many words you want to rewrite each month. To get started, I had to create an account, which was pretty straightforward.

One feature that really caught my eye is the freeze-list option—it lets you lock in specific keywords so they don’t get changed during the rewrite process.

I think that’s super handy, especially for technical documents where you need certain terms, expressions, or phrases to stay exactly as they are.

It’s a thoughtful touch that makes me curious about how well GPTinf performs.

Is GPTinf Effective in Bypassing AI Detection?

For a proper GPTinf review, I need to figure out if its humanized content can actually bypass various AI detectors.

To get started, I turned to ChatGPT and asked it to write a short article about the future of vehicle autopilot. I’m excited to see how GPTinf handles this and whether it can make the text undetectable.

The article ChatGPT generated is pretty much what I’d expect—classic AI-generated content that’s probably going to be flagged by AI detectors.

So, I went ahead and copied the whole thing and pasted it into GPTinf to see what kind of magic it can work. I’m really curious to check out the result and whether this humanized text can evade detection or not.

Right from the start, I spotted a few errors in GPTinf’s rewritten article. One thing I’ve noticed with AI humanizers is that their grammar isn’t always flawless when they try to rephrase sentences.

I’m guessing this might be intentional—GPTinf could be slipping in “human errors” to make the text seem more natural and boost its chances of evading AI detectors by mimicking those imperfections we sometimes make.

For example, in the “More Safety” section, the first line said “in future” instead of “in the future,” which felt a bit stiff to me. Also, in the last sentence, “usher in” was misspelled as “usher-in,” which was indeed a small but noticeable error.

With these kinds of errors popping up throughout the article, I had to manually edit them to make the piece polished and presentable.

Honestly, that sounds like a bit of a hassle and extra work I wasn’t expecting.

But for now, let’s say I’m okay with the output as is. The real test is how it holds up against various AI detectors, so let’s see how GPTinf performs!

GPTinf Against Originality.ai

When I ran GPTinf’s humanized article through Originality.ai, the results were a bit of a bummer. The entire text showed up in red, flagged as AI-generated. Originality.ai scored it at 15% original and 85% AI, which, honestly, was not great.

Just to clarify, these scores don’t mean the article is 15% human-written and 85% AI. It’s more about the tool’s confidence level—Originality.ai was 85% sure this text was AI-generated.

I was hoping GPTinf would do better at bypassing this tool, but this made me question how effective it really is.

GPTinf Against GPTZero

I was really disappointed when I tested GPTinf’s output with GPTZero—it performed even worse than with Originality.ai.

Every single sentence got highlighted in yellow, clearly marked as AI-generated, as you can see in the below screenshot.

GPTZero gave it a rough score of 94% AI and just 6% human. Honestly, I was hoping for better results, but this makes it pretty clear that GPTinf was struggling to bypass this AI detector.

GPTinf Against Copyleaks

In contrast to the other tools, Copyleaks provided a more straightforward result. All sentences were highlighted in red, indicating that the article was AI-generated.

This further confirms that all of these three AI detectors independently flag the same piece of text as AI content.

A Better Alternative to GPTinf: Humbot

I was initially drawn to GPTinf. But honestly, I’m let down. The text it generates often has small errors, which is a pain. Worst of all, it struggles to bypass AI detectors, undermining its main purpose.

If you’re searching for a tool that actually delivers, I’d point you toward Humbot instead. It’s a solid alternative that handles AI-generated text from models like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude with ease.

Humbot can generate humanized content that effortlessly evades big-name AI detectors like GPTZero and Originality.ai.

Plus, it comes with a bunch of extra features that make it a much more dependable choice for anyone serious about creating undetectable, high-quality content.

Humbot utilizes cutting-edge text humanization tech to make AI-generated content completely undetectable. The output genuinely feels like it was written by a human from start to finish.

Plus, for anyone worried about originality, Humbot’s got you covered with a 100% plagiarism-free guarantee.

That means I can confidently share the AI content as my own without any stress about potential issues. It’s such a relief to have a tool that delivers on both quality and peace of mind!

Humbot Main Features

Here are some of its highlights:

• Compatible with all types of AI content
• Utilizes advanced humanization technology
• Consistently performs well against popular AI detectors
• Content free from plagiarism
• Optimized text humanization for SEO purposes
• Bypasses spam filters in email

Is Humbot More Effective Than GPTinf for Evading AI Detection?

To demonstrate the superior effectiveness of Humbot over GPTinf, I used the same text that was generated by ChatGPT and put it through Humbot.

Subsequently, I subjected the results to the same AI detectors mentioned earlier, allowing for a clear comparison between the two platforms.

For your reference, here is the humanized text from Humbot:

Unlike GPTinf, Humbot’s rewritten article came out clean with no obvious errors. I didn’t have to spend time double-checking for grammar or spelling mistakes after the humanization process, which saved me a ton of hassle.

It’s such a relief to work with a tool that gets it right the first time!

Now, let’s see how well Humbot performed:

Humbot Versus Originality.ai

Originality.ai's evaluation of Humbot presented a stark contrast to GPTinf. This AI detector assigned Humbot a score of 91% for originality and 1% for AI.

This indicated that the software was highly confident that the resulting text was written by a human.

Humbot Versus GPTZero

Humbot also performed well when tested against GPTZero. In fact, the software assigned a 0% score for AI, suggesting that it did not believe any sentence in the article was generated solely by AI.

There was a 6% score for mixed content, but overall, GPTZero seemed to consider the article as being written by humans.

Humbot Versus Copyleaks

Copyleaks provided me with a similarly straightforward result. This time, there were no highlighted sentences, and the verdict was that the article was human-written.

GPTinf versus Humbot: A Comparative Analysis of the Results

Just take a look at this quick comparison between the outcomes of both AI humanizers:

It’s pretty obvious to me that Humbot comes out on top in all three tests. While GPTinf kept getting identified as AI-generated, Humbot’s human-like content totally evaded every AI detector.

Hands down, Humbot is the better pick for both content quality and bypassing AI detection—there’s no question about it in my mind!

Conclusion

I will admit, GPTinf’s user-friendly interface and cool features for text humanization caught my eye at first. But when it comes to actually bypassing modern AI detectors, it just doesn’t cut it.

Plus, those small errors in the output mean I’d have to spend extra time modifying, which is a real pain in my opinion.

After all the tests, I’m convinced that putting your trust in tools like Humbot is a smarter move.