Lately, I have been searching for AI writing tools and encountered an AI bypass tool called CheatGPT.
It’s got a clever name, riffing off “ChatGPT,” and it promises to help me slip past those popular AI detection tools out there.
But can I really trust it to deliver? Here’s what I found out in my CheatGPT test review.
Easily Make Your AI Text Undetectable by AI Checkers with Humbot
If CheatGPT falls short in bypassing AI detection, don't despair. Choose Humbot instead, which guarantees that your AI content will achieve a 100% human score!
What Exactly Is CheatGPT?

CheatGPT was built by a college student named Adam Oommen Jacob as a side project while he was studying engineering—pretty impressive for a solo gig!
It’s free to try out, which is awesome, but there’s also a premium plan for more advanced features.
This AI humanizer has not received significant funding and is smaller in scale compared to other undetectable writing tools. Consequently, it lacks the more powerful features of its competitors and is not as fully functional.
It is a relatively simple tool that merely rewrites text in an attempt to bypass AI detection.
Can CheatGPT Bypass the Top AI Detection Tools?
Even though CheatGPT was just a side project whipped up by a college student, it’s not as well-known as some of the big names in undetectable AI writing.
Still, it boldly claims it can bypass most of the top AI detectors.
But does it actually live up to that hype? I figured the only way to know for sure was to put it to the test. So, that’s exactly what I did.
First, I hopped over to ChatGPT and asked it to write a short 300-word piece about “family and love.” Here’s what ChatGPT came up with:

I was curious to see how CheatGPT would tweak the AI text to make it seem more human and whether it could actually bypass AI detectors.
So, I took the 300-word text from ChatGPT and pasted it into CheatGPT to give it a whirl. Unfortunately, I hit a snag right away—CheatGPT has a strict 180-word limit, which was a bit of a letdown.

As you can see from the screenshot above, I couldn’t use the full 300-word sample with CheatGPT without upgrading to their premium plan.
To work around this issue, I decided to cut the sample down to about 180 words so I could test it out using their free plan.
After doing that, I got a “humanized” version from CheatGPT, which you can see below.

CheatGPT Versus Originality.AI
I decided to put CheatGPT to the test using Originality.AI, one of the toughest AI detectors, known for its advanced tech in spotting AI-generated content. So, how did CheatGPT hold up? Let’s dive into the outcomes.

At first glance, I was pretty impressed—CheatGPT scored a near-perfect 96% “Human” with just 4% flagged as “AI.” But when I dug a little deeper, things started to unravel.

I noticed something odd with the title box Originality.AI generated. It just pulled the first few words of the text, but letters like “A” and “C” were mysteriously missing.
That wasn’t the only red flag. When I closely read CheatGPT’s humanized output, I realized it was identical to what ChatGPT had given me.
CheatGPT hadn’t “humanized” anything—it didn’t even tweak the text, except in one sneaky way.
After some sleuthing, I spotted the trick: the letters “A,” “C,” “D,” and “P” looked slightly off. And there’s a reason for that.

Turns out, CheatGPT had swapped them out for Cyrillic alternatives. These symbols mimic regular letters so well that AI detectors aren’t trained to catch them. It’s a clever way to fool those AI detectors—and, honestly, its users too.
To test this, I went back to CheatGPT’s humanized text, replaced all the Cyrillic letters with standard ones, and ran the scan again.

As the screenshot above shows, the results were far less impressive this time. With the regular letters back in place, CheatGPT scored a dismal 0% Human on Originality.AI, since the text was essentially unchanged from ChatGPT’s original output.
CheatGPT Versus GPTZero
The failures persist for CheatGPT in the subsequent test. When I ran the humanized text through GPTZero, it returned a dreadful 98% AI result, indicating that only 2% of the text seems to be human-written.

CheatGPT Versus Copyleaks
Once again, in my third test, CheatGPT falls short. Its text was easily identified as AI content by Copyleaks, conclusively proving that this AI writing tool is not a dependable AI humanizer.

A More Dependable Undetectable AI Writer: Humbot
After testing CheatGPT, I was honestly disappointed to find out it’s pretty deceptive.
All it does is swap out certain letters with sneaky symbols to trick both users and AI detectors. In short, it’s not a reliable AI humanizer by any stretch. If you’re looking for a truly undetectable AI writing tool, you’ll need to keep searching.
One tool that really stands out is Humbot. It uses some seriously advanced tech to transform AI-generated text into content that flies under the radar.
It carefully rewrites and restructures the AI-generated text, making it sound so naturally human while still keeping the original meaning intact.

Humbot is able to outwit some of the top AI detectors like GPTZero, Originality.ai, copyleaks and much more.
Plus, it supports multiple languages, which makes it a fantastic choice for users all over the globe.
Notable Features
Some of the Humbot’s highlights include:
- Able to humanize content from ChatGPT, Gemini, and much more.
- Outperforms detection tools like Winston AI, ZeroGPT, Sapling, and others.
- Achieves 100% human ratings.
- Operates in over 50 languages.
- Preserves the original meaning of your text.
- Optimizes content for improved SEO scores.
- Includes built-in AI scanning and detection.
Is Humbot More Effective in Evading AI Detection?
While CheatGPT relies on sneaky tricks to boost its AI detection scores, Humbot takes a more dependable approach, using advanced natural language modeling to genuinely humanize my AI content.
But just how well does it work? To find out, I put Humbot through the same test as CheatGPT, using the same ChatGPT text to see which tool could better bypass AI detectors.
Here’s the text that Humbot humanized, based on ChatGPT’s original creation.

As you can see, unlike CheatGPT, Humbot effectively humanized the AI-generated text, altering the words, structure, and flow, while maintaining the original meaning.
Humbot vs. Originality.AI
In the battle against Originality.AI, Humbot achieved an almost flawless score. Its text received a 98% Original rating, with only 2% classified as AI-generated. This stands in stark contrast to CheatGPT, which scored 0% in terms of original content.

Humbot vs. GPTZero
In my second test on GPTZero, Humbot continued to impress. It garnered an impressive 99% human rating, with only a 1% chance of the text being generated by AI. Once again, Humbot outperformed CheatGPT.

Humbot vs. Copyleaks
Last but not least, Humbot also received a human rating from Copyleaks. This is an accomplishment that CheatGPT was unable to achieve.

In conclusion, Humbot successfully passed all of the three AI detectors, while CheatGPT failed to bypass any of them.
The Showdown: CheatGPT vs. Humbot
The table below shows the results of my testing for both undetectable AI writers:
AI Detector | CheatGPT Results | Humbot Results |
Originality.AI | 0% Human | 98% Human |
GPTZero | 2% Human | 99% Human |
Copyleaks | AI-Written | Human-Written |
It’s pretty clear to me now: CheatGPT just can’t hold its own against AI detectors without leaning on its sneaky Cyrillic letter trick.
It doesn’t actually humanize AI content—it just swaps letters with symbols to deceive us. Honestly, it’s far from being a true undetectable AI writer.
Humbot, however, knocks it out of the park, consistently delivering content that feels genuinely human.
Beyond that, Humbot leaves CheatGPT in the dust with its advanced features, offering a ton of extra functions, support for multiple languages, and a whole suite of AI writing tools.
For anyone wanting to use AI without worrying about getting flagged, Humbot is undoubtedly the more effective choice.
Final Thoughts
When I put CheatGPT through its paces, it really didn’t live up to the hype. Despite claiming to be an undetectable AI tool that can bypass AI detectors, it’s just playing a basic letter-swapping game.
Anyone could pull off that trick, and many AI detectors are already catching on, upgrading to spot these Cyrillic letters and symbol dodges.
If you’re serious about getting undetectable content, I’d say go with a more trustworthy option like Humbot.